Wednesday, 16 October, 2019

Nepal Democracy

Election Manifesto

Making imagined futures a cornerstone of understanding the dynamics of capitalism is a distinct departure from most current scholarship on the economy in sociology and po liti cal science. Over the past thirty years the slogan “history matters” has become a rallying cry for both historical institutionalism and sociology. To explain current outcomes, historical institutionalists investigate the long- term structural trajectories that form developmental paths and shape choices in the present (Mahoney 2000).

 

Institutional paths differ from country to country and cannot be easily abandoned; in general, only external shocks are seen to cause a shift in these trajectories. Sociological institutionalists, though they place a stronger emphasis on cognition, are similarly oriented toward the past, and see social change as a pro cess of isomorphic adaptation to existing institutional models (DiMaggio and Powell 1991). Political scientists and sociologists concur in their assumption that pres ent outcomes are formed by past occurrences.

 

But not all disciplines in the social sciences agree that the pres ent is largely determined by the past. In a chapter on the concept of temporality in sociology, Andrew Abbott (2005) pointed out that sociologists and economists apply opposing strategies when explaining events in the present. “Decisions are explained by the pres ent value of expected future rewards”