Immigration shapes nations. Nepal and Italy, though worlds apart in geography and culture, face similar challenges in managing migrant flows and residency systems. Nepal, nestled in the Himalayas, grapples with porous borders and economic migration. Italy, a European gateway, balances humanitarian obligations with economic demands. Both countries offer unique residency models and migrant support systems. What can Nepal learn from Italy’s approach? Let’s explore their policies, highlight key differences, and uncover lessons for a more inclusive future.
Migration is a global reality. For Nepal, it’s often about survival. Many Nepalis leave for work in Gulf countries or India, seeking better wages. Italy, meanwhile, attracts retirees, entrepreneurs, and refugees, offering diverse residency options like the Elective Residency Visa for those who wish to apply for a retirement visa in Italy. Nepal’s immigration system is less structured, focusing on temporary labor migration. Italy’s policies, shaped by EU regulations, provide a framework Nepal could adapt to manage its diaspora and attract skilled migrants.
Italy’s Residency Models: A Structured Approach
Italy’s immigration system is robust. It offers multiple residency pathways tailored to different needs. The Elective Residency Visa targets retirees or those with passive income, allowing them to live in Italy without working. Applicants need to prove financial stability, ensuring they won’t burden the state. Another option, the Investor Visa, lures wealthy individuals with investments starting at €250,000. Italy also has work visas for skilled professionals and family reunification programs. These options reflect Italy’s balance of economic growth and social integration.
Why does this matter? Italy’s structured visas create predictability. Migrants know the requirements, and authorities can regulate inflows. For example, the Elective Residency Visa requires proof of income, health insurance, and housing. This clarity reduces illegal migration and eases administrative strain. Italy also offers integration programs, like language courses and job training, to help migrants settle. These efforts show a commitment to long-term inclusion, not just border control.
Nepal’s Immigration Landscape: Fluid but Fragmented
Nepal’s immigration system is less defined. Its open border with India, governed by the 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship, allows free movement. Millions of Nepalis work in India, and vice versa, without formal visas. This fluidity boosts economic ties but complicates regulation. Nepal also issues tourist visas and limited work permits, but its residency options are minimal. The Non-Resident Nepali (NRN) visa, for instance, allows diaspora members to stay longer but lacks clear incentives for investment or integration.
What’s the challenge here? Nepal’s system prioritizes temporary migration over long-term residency. Many Nepalis abroad send remittances, which account for nearly 30% of Nepal’s GDP. Yet, there’s little focus on attracting skilled migrants or retirees to boost the economy. Support for incoming migrants is sparse, with no formal integration programs. This gap leaves Nepal vulnerable to brain drain and limits its appeal as a destination for global talent.
Migrant Support Systems: Italy’s Edge
Italy invests in migrant support. Beyond visas, it offers language classes, cultural orientation, and access to healthcare. Refugees and asylum seekers receive temporary housing and legal aid through NGOs and government partnerships. For example, the SPRAR system (Protection System for Asylum Seekers and Refugees) provides tailored support, helping migrants transition to independent living. These programs aren’t perfect—overcrowding and bureaucracy persist—but they show a proactive approach.
Contrast this with Nepal. Support for incoming migrants is almost nonexistent. Foreign workers, often from India or China, rely on employers for housing and legal guidance. There’s no centralized system for language training or cultural integration. Nepali returnees, meanwhile, face reintegration challenges. Many struggle to find jobs despite their overseas experience. A structured support system, like Italy’s, could help Nepal retain talent and attract foreign expertise.
Lessons for Nepal: Building a Balanced System
What can Nepal learn? First, diversify residency options. Italy’s tiered visa system—retirees, investors, workers—offers a model. Nepal could introduce a retiree visa, targeting those drawn to its natural beauty and low living costs. A clear investor visa could attract foreign capital, especially in tourism or hydropower. These steps would require transparent criteria, like Italy’s income or investment thresholds, to ensure economic benefits without straining resources.
Second, Nepal needs better migrant support. Italy’s language and job training programs could inspire Nepal to create similar initiatives. For example, offering Nepali language classes to foreign workers could ease integration. Support for returnees, like job placement services, would maximize the benefits of remittances and skills gained abroad. These efforts demand investment, but the payoff—economic growth and social cohesion—would be worth it.
Third, Nepal must strengthen border management. Italy’s EU-backed border controls, while not flawless, provide a framework for tracking migration flows. Nepal’s open border with India is a strength, but it needs better monitoring to curb illegal activities. Digital visa systems, like Italy’s, could streamline processes and reduce corruption. A balanced approach would maintain regional ties while enhancing security.
Challenges and Opportunities
Adopting Italy’s model isn’t simple. Nepal faces resource constraints Italy doesn’t. Building a robust immigration system requires funding, trained staff, and political will. Corruption, a persistent issue, could undermine reforms. Yet, Nepal has unique strengths. Its cultural diversity and natural attractions could draw retirees and investors if marketed well. The diaspora, spread across the globe, is a ready pool of talent and capital if incentivized to return or invest.
Italy’s system isn’t perfect either. Bureaucracy can delay visa approvals, and anti-immigrant sentiment sometimes flares. Nepal must avoid these pitfalls. A transparent, inclusive system would build trust. Engaging local communities in integration efforts, as Italy does through NGOs, could prevent backlash. Nepal’s small size and tight-knit society could make community-based support more effective than in larger nations.
READ ALSO: Top Things You Need to Know When Travelling to Nepal
A Path Forward for Nepal
Nepal stands at a crossroads. Its migration policies, shaped by necessity, have served short-term needs but lack vision. Italy’s experience shows that structured residency options and migrant support can drive economic and social gains. By diversifying visas, enhancing support systems, and improving border management, Nepal could transform migration into an opportunity. The goal isn’t to copy Italy but to adapt its best practices to Nepal’s unique context.
Imagine a Nepal that attracts global retirees to its serene mountains, lures investors to its untapped markets, and welcomes back its diaspora with open arms. This vision requires bold reforms, but the rewards—economic growth, cultural exchange, and global connectivity—are within reach. Nepal can learn from Italy’s successes and mistakes, crafting a migration system that reflects its values and ambitions. The time to act is now.